I. Content/Relevancy/Teaching Methods:

1) Content was appropriate for intended audience

2) Content was consistent with stated learning objectives

3) Content included recent studies/findings/literature on topic

4) Teaching methods were appropriate and effective for subject matter

5) This program is appropriate to my education, experience, and skills levels

6) Issues of diversity were addressed

7) I did not perceive any commercial bias or conflict of interest

8) Information could contribute to achieving personal and professional goals

9) The presentation facilitated the integration and synthesis of information

10) I would recommend this program to others

11) This session met or exceeded my expectations

II. Learning Objectives:
1) Discuss the power of transference and countertransference in the play therapy relationship

2) Analyze therapist’s own relationship with play and discuss how this affects relationships with play therapy clients

3) Apply strategies to remain present and emotionally regulated as a therapist in order to effectively provide coregulation in play therapy sessions

III.Presenter:  Nik Johnson, M.A., LPC, RPT, EMDR Consultant
1) Knowledgeable in content areas

2) Presented the subject matter clearly and clarified content

3) Responsive to participants and to their questions

4) Maintained my interest

5) Provided a variety of applied examples

6) Reviewed limitations to material presented

7) Described severe and most common risks, including limitations of content being taught

IV.Overall Rating:
1) This session met or exceeded my expectations

2) How much did you learn as a result of the CE program?

3) How useful was the content of this CE program for your practice and other professional development?

4) What do you perceive was the educational level of this presentation?

V. Comments About This Session: